In any event, Mark Goodacre has links to several blogs and sites that deal with this allegation and if the publicity intrigues you, you probably want to check it out.
UPDATE:
Here's another good roundup of discussions on the tomb.
And this is quite interesting. James Davila over at Paleojudaica has some information from Richard Bauckham on statistical data about first century Jewish names and other interpretive issues about the tomb inscriptions, including this tidbit.
Just scroll down until you get to the UPDATE remarks.We have a data base of about 3000 named persons (2625 men, 328 women). Of the 2625 men, the name Joseph was borne by 218 or 8.3%. (It is the second most popular Jewish male name, after Simon/Simeon.) The name Judah was borne by 164 or 6.2%. The name Jesus was borne by 99 or 3.4%. The name Matthew was borne 62 or 2.4 %. Of the 328 named women (women’s names were much less often recorded than men’s), a staggering 70 or 21.4% were called Mary (Mariam, Maria, Mariame, Mariamme).
No comments:
Post a Comment