tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23025586.post75483204830186862..comments2009-03-10T13:09:29.809-05:00Gary Greenbergggreenberg@msn.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23025586.post-21495277327799657492009-03-10T13:09:00.000-05:002009-03-10T13:09:00.000-05:00

I think it's amazing that you spend your life wondering about a so-called mangod. It's like a page out of greek mythology. When the messiah comes he will achieve his tasks, not fail miserably at them and be killed like a common criminal.Come on! Moreover, The messiah is not supposed to be Gd he is sent by Gd to bring truth of the ONE true Gd, the Gd of the Israelites, restore Jerusalem and the

Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23025586.post-13511713776834592222007-07-20T21:07:00.000-05:002007-07-20T21:07:00.000-05:00

As I noted in the article, it is anti-Semites who cite the passage as support for their position. This doesn't mean they are right. The note from the scholar that I cited is in line with your interpretation that the charge is against only those who took the action in question. The problem, however, is that many translaters put the comma into this passage, changing the meaning from restrictive to

Gary Greenberghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16115546381847390644noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-23025586.post-76192202539623971122007-07-19T22:22:00.000-05:002007-07-19T22:22:00.000-05:00

Your argument does not take the overall context of the New Testament into account. Jesus and all the apostles, not to mention John the Baptist, and Paul himself, were all Jews. In the New Testament, however, when a phrase like this is stated "...even as they have of the Jews: who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are

Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com